![]() Its assembly is Strong-Named and Signed with a key. Specific ones have adapter sufix: MainNuget +. Package manager console command for installation: Install-Package EFCore.BulkExtensions Only single specific can be installed in a project, if need more then use main one with all providers. That is main nuget for all Databases, there are also specific ones with single provider for those who need small packages. Instead Test options are SqlServer(Developer or Express), LocalDb( if alongside Developer v.), or with other adapters. SQLite has no Copy tool, instead library uses plain SQL combined with UPSERT.īulk Tests can not have UseInMemoryDb because InMemoryProvider does not support Relational-specific methods. MySQL (8+) is using MySqlBulkCopy combined with ON DUPLICATE for Update. PostgreSQL (9.5+) is using COPY BINARY combined with ON CONFLICT for Update. SQLServer (or SqlAzure) under the hood uses SqlBulkCopy for Insert, Update/Delete = BulkInsert + raw Sql MERGE. When opening issues do write detailed explanation of the problem or feature with reproducible example. Please read CONTRIBUTING for details on code of conduct, and the process for submitting pull requests. If you find this project useful you can mark it by leaving a Github Star ⭐.Īnd even with community license you can make a DONATION: If eligible for free usage but still want to help development and have active support, consider purchasing Starter Lic. If you do not meet criteria for free usage with community license then you have to buy commercial one. *BulkExtensions licensed under Dual License v1.0 (solution to OpenSource funding, cFOSS: conditionallyFree OSS). Supports all 4 mayor sql databases: SQLServer, PostgreSQL, MySQL, SQLite.Ĭheck out Testimonials from the Community and User Comments. Was selected in top 20 EF Core Extensions recommended by Microsoft. Library is Lightweight and very Efficient, having all mostly used CRUD operation. Batch ops: Delete, Update - will be Deprecated since EF7 has native Execute-Up/Del and Truncate. ![]() (I also wonder if it's higher-performing that doing multiple separate Postgres calls for millions of rows.-Bulk operations (very fast): Insert, Update, Delete, Read, Upsert, Sync, SaveChanges. I'm already doing what I want with a for-loop (by doing 1 separate Postgres call for each row upsert, which is ugly), but I wonder if the last call I proposed is guaranteed to do what I want? (It does in this case, at least.) So, what I want is a fine-grained "row-by-row" independent upsert, not an "all-or-nothing" upsert over ALL rows. The desired result (after the upsert) is that: So I'm only left with the following: INSERT INTO t00 (userid,col00,col01) VALUES Or (also invalid Postgres, I checked): INSERT INTO t00 (userid,col00,col01) VALUES What I want is something like the following (invalid Postgres, I checked): INSERT INTO t00 (userid,col00,col01) ![]() So you INSERT rows and update 1 row: INSERT INTO t00 (userid) VALUES (0),(1) ![]() Such that I want to update col01 conditionally based on the value of col00. there's a table: DROP TABLE IF EXISTS t00 INSERT ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE SET multiple rows).īut I want the ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE SET conditional check/update do be done row-wise (ie. I'm trying to UPSERT multiple rows into a Postgres table (ie.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |